Measures to Prevent Aspartimide Formation

Measures to Prevent Aspartimide Formation

Published on 25.08.2021

Aspartimide formation remains one major hurdle during peptide synthesis. Read on to find out more about different strategies and available products at Iris Biotech in order to avoid this side product.

The event of aspartimide formation represents a serious challenge to tackle during the synthesis of aspartate-containing peptides as it leads to lowered yields, difficult purifications, or even inaccessible sequences. Aspartimides are formed upon ring-closure between the nitrogen of the alpha-carboxyl amide bond and the beta-carboxyl sidechain and subsequent release of the beta-carboxyl protecting group. The formed aspartimides undergo rapid epimerization followed by ring opening either by hydrolysis or by virtue of base (as used frequently during Fmoc SPPS), thus leading to the formation of up to eight additional potential by-products.

Aspartimide formation is reported to be sequence dependent and often occurs in Asp-Gly containing sequences. For such peptides, the use of Fmoc-Asp(OtBu)-(Dmb)Gly-OH (FDP1380) (see related products) is shown to be highly beneficial. 2,4-Dimethylbenzyl (Dmb) acts as an auxiliary protecting group temporarily masking the amide nitrogen of a peptide bond. Its efficacy and ease of introduction under standard coupling methods, e.g. PyBOP®/DIPEA or DIPCDI/HOBt, make it a valuable building block to prevent aspartimide formation and thus the subsequent formation of undesired side products arising from it. After successful peptide synthesis, the N-Dmb group can be removed by addition of TFA, typically during TFA cleavage of the peptide from the resin. If a differently modified Asp derivative is desired, Iris Biotech is also offering Fmoc-(Dmb)Gly-OH (FAA3390) itself, which can then be introduced ahead of any Asp residue of choice.

Moreover, aspartimide formation also depends on the peptide conformation and can thus be influenced by placing pseudoproline dipeptides, which are reported to be structure disrupting, ahead of an aspartimide-prone Asp residue.

Another practical approach, which is rather sequence-independent, describes the use of sterically demanding, longer alkyl chain aspartic acid esters instead of the commonly used OtBu side chain protecting group. The resulting shielding of the aspartyl beta-carboxyl group allows to minimize the formation of aspartimide-derived by-products. Iris Biotech offers a selection of bulky beta-trialkyl-methyl ester protected aspartic acid building blocks (see related products).

Just recently, the Bode group invented a Fmoc-protected Asp(cyanosulfurylide) (FAA8480) which turned out to completely suppress aspartimide formation during peptide synthesis. In contrast to hydrophobic bulky Asp derivatives, which often suffer from poor solubility and low coupling efficiency, CSY benefits of enhanced solubility. Instead of the C-O bond present in bulky Asp-esters, Asp(CSY) bears a stable C-C bond. The protecting group can be selectively and quantitatively cleaved from protected or unprotected peptides under aqueous conditions with electrophilic halogen species, e.g. N-chlorosuccinimide, to regenerate the carboxylic acid from the ylide, while being stable towards strong reducing agents, transition metals, strong acids and strong bases.

In summary, different options are available to tackle aspartimide formation and the most fitting one needs to be chosen with regard to sequence and synthetic requirements. If you are interested in details on how to avoid aspartimide formation, register for our Workshop Series and benefit from the unique research insights of Prof. Dr. Jeffrey W. Bode (ETH Zurich).

 

References:

  • N,O-bisFmoc derivatives of N-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-amino acids: Useful intermediates in peptide synthesis; T. Johnson, M. Quibell, R. C. Sheppard; J. Pept. Sci. 1995; 1: 11-25.https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.310010104.

  • Biomimetic Screening of Class-B G Protein-Coupled Receptors; C. Devigny, F. Perez-Balderas, B. Hoogeland, S. Cuboni, R. Wachtel, C. P. Mauch, K. J. Webb, J. M. Deussing, F. Hausch; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133(23): 8927-8933. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200160s.

  • Backbone protection: synthesis of difficult sequences using N-α-Tmob-protected amino acid; N. Clausen, C. Goldammer, K. Jauch, E. Bayer; Peptides 1996: Proceedings of the 14th American Peptide Symposium; 1996: 71-72.

  • An alternative method for the preparation of resin-bound secondary amines; R. E. Austin, C. A. Waldraff, F. Al-OSynthesis of Transmembrane Segments of a Voltage-Gated K+-Channel: Prevention of Aggregation by Bulky Solubilising Protecting Groups; K. Jauch, C. Goldammer, N. Clausen, E. Bayer; Peptides 1998: Proceedings of the 24th European Peptide Symposium 1998: 497-498.

  • All-L-Leu-Pro-Leu-Pro: a challenging cyclization; M. El Haddadi, F. Cavelier, E. Vives, A. Azmani, J. Verducci, J. Martinez; J. Pept. Sci. 2000; 6: 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1387(200011)6:11<560::aid-psc275>3.0.co;2-i.

  • Efficient synthesis and comparative studies of the arginine and Nω,Nω-dimethylarginine forms of the human nucleolin glycine/arginine rich domain; S. Zahariev, C. Guarnaccia, F. Zanuttin, A. Pintar, G. Esposito, G. Maravić, B. Krust, A. G. Hovanessian, S. Pongor; J. Pept. Sci. 2005; 11: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.577.

  • Preventing aspartimide formation in Fmoc SPPS of Asp-Gly containing peptides - practical aspects of new trialkylcarbinol based protecting groups; R. Behrendt, S. Huber, P. White; J. Pept. Sci. 2016; 22(2): 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2844.

  • New t-butyl based aspartate protecting groups preventing aspartimide formation in Fmoc SPPS; R. Behrendt, S. Huber, R. Marti, P. White; J. Pept. Sci. 2015; 21(8): 680-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2790.

  • 2-phenyl isopropyl esters as carboxyl terminus protecting groups in the fast synthesis of peptide fragments; C. Yue, J. Thierry, P. Potier; Tetrahedron Lett. 1993; 34: 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(00)60578-6.

  • The aspartimide problem in Fmoc-based SPPS. Part I; M. Mergler, F. Dick, B. Sax, P. Weiler, T. Vorherr; J. Pept. Sci. 2003; 9(1): 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.430.

  • A new protecting group for aspartic acid that minimizes piperidine-catalyzed aspartimide formation in Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis; A. Karlström, A. Undén; Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37(24): 4243-4246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4039(96)00807-6.

  • The aspartimide problem in Fmoc‐based SPPS. Part II; M. Mergler, F. Dick, B. Sax, C. Stähelin, T. Vorherr; J. Pept. Sci. 2003; 9(8): 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.473.

  • Prevention of aspartimide formation during peptide synthesis using cyanosulfurylides as carboxylic acid-protecting groups; K. Neumann, J. Farnung, S. Baldauf, J. W. Bode; Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14755-6.

  • Patent EP 2 886 531 B1

  • Pseudo-Prolines as a Molecular Hinge:  Reversible Induction of cis Amide Bonds into Peptide Backbones; P. Dumy, M. Keller, D. E. Ryan, B. Rohwedder, T. Wöhr, M. Mutter; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 918-925. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja962780a.

  • Pseudo-Prolines as a Solubilizing, Structure-Disrupting Protection Technique in Peptide Synthesis; T. Wöhr, F. Wahl, A. Nefzi, B. Rohwedder, T. Sato, X. Sun, M. Mutter; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 9218-9227. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja961509q.

  • Total chemical synthesis of the D2 domain of human VEGF receptor 1; V. Goncalves, B. Gautier, F. Huguenot, P. Leproux, C. Garbay, M. Vidal, N. Inguimbert; J. Pept. Sci. 2009; 15: 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.1133.

  • Incorporation of Pseudoproline Derivatives Allows the Facile Synthesis of Human IAPP, a Highly Amyloidogenic and Aggregation-Prone Polypeptide; A. Abedini, D. P. Raleigh; Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 693-696. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol047480+.

  • Expediting the Fmoc solid phase synthesis of long peptides through the application of dimethyloxazolidine dipeptides; P. White, J. W. Keyte, K. Bailey, G. Bloomberg; J. Pept. Sci. 2004; 10: 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.484.

  • An improved synthetic and purification procedure for the hydrophobic segment of the transmembrane peptide phospholamban; E. K. Tiburu, P. C. Dave, J. F. Vanlerberghe, T. B. Cardon, R. E. Minto, G. A. Lorigan; Anal. Biochem. 2003; 318: 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2697(03)00141-6.

  • Aspartimide formation in base-driven 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chemistry; Y. Yang, W. V. Sweeney, K. Schneider, S. Thörnqvist, B. T. Chait, J. P. Tam; Tetrahedron Lett. 1994; 35(52): 9689-9692. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-4039(94)88360-2.

  • Application of Dmb-Dipeptides in the Fmoc SPPS of Difficult and Aspartimide-Prone Sequences; V. Cardona, I. Eberle, S. Barthélémy, J. Beythien, B. Doerner, P. Schneeberger, J. Keyte, P. D. White; Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2008; 14: 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-008-9154-z.

  • Advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis; R. Behrendt, P. White, J. Offer; J. Pept. Sci. 2016; 22(1): 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2836.

Verwandte Produkte
    1. Structure image for Fmoc-DmbGly-OH
      Fmoc-DmbGly-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA3390

      Startet von 95,00 €

    2. Structure image for Fmoc-TmbGly-OH
      Fmoc-TmbGly-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA3400

      Startet von 55,00 €

    3. Structure image for Fmoc-L-Asp(OMpe)-OH
      Fmoc-L-Asp(OMpe)-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA8120

      Startet von 125,00 €

    4. Structure image for Fmoc-L-Asp-OMpe
      Fmoc-L-Asp-OMpe

      Art-Nr.: FAA8090

      Startet von 300,00 €

    5. Structure image for Fmoc-L-Asp(OBno)-OH
      Fmoc-L-Asp(OBno)-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA8125

      Startet von 175,00 €

    6. Structure image for Fmoc-L-Asp(tBu)-DmbGly-OH
      Fmoc-L-Asp(tBu)-DmbGly-OH

      Art-Nr.: FDP1380

      Startet von auf Anfrage

    7. Structure image for Fmoc-L-Asp(CSY)-OH
      Fmoc-L-Asp(CSY)-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA8480

      Startet von 375,00 €

    8. Structure image for Fmoc-D-Asp(CSY)-OH
      Fmoc-D-Asp(CSY)-OH

      Art-Nr.: FAA8483

      Startet von 125,00 €